Page 6 of 10

Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 7:20 pm
by Paka
*in televangelist voice*

Re-PAYNT, Brotha Loomis!! The PAHWAH of CHRAHST compayls yah!!

(translation - Repent, Brother Loomis! The power of Christ compells you!)

Hehe... anyway, good on ya, Richard, for starting such a great debate! I started losing interest when MMb began to cut-and-paste whole documents, but hey. :D

As for me, I'm not religious, and I don't plan on "joining the flock" anytime soon. LOL - Christianity is just not to my taste; going to a private Christian school for 7 years kinda took all the flavor out. ;)

Back on topic, though - I'll probably rent the film when it comes out on dvd - I got a burned soundtrack from a friend and the music is nice - all choral an' stuff. Hehe...

Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 7:30 pm
by Loomis
Paka wrote:*in televangelist voice*

Re-PAYNT, Brotha Loomis!! The PAHWAH of CHRAHST compayls yah!!

(translation - Repent, Brother Loomis! The power of Christ compells you!)
This is starting to remind me of that scene from the Blues Brothers. You know "What light???" :lol:
paka wrote:As for me, I'm not religious, and I don't plan on "joining the flock" anytime soon. LOL - Christianity is just not to my taste; going to a private Christian school for 7 years kinda took all the flavor out. ;)
Yup, that pretty much killed it for me too. And none of this is to suggest that I don't have some degree of faith, but it just means that the whole "organized" faith aspect disagrees with me, and the fact that many see the bible, as well...just that! An ultimate book to justify everything.

As for the film in question...

It has taken over 250 million dollarsproving that we either have a lot of people feeling guilty out there, or that all it take to sell people christ is to talk about how a film is ant-semetic or bloody constantly on the news. Or it could have something to do with the fact that people are giving them away! :D


Man buys 6,000 tickets for 'Passion,' gives them away
http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=17568

UK Churches Give Away Gibson Tickets:

Four English churches are offering free cinema tickets to see Mel Gibson's film The Passion of the Christ in an attempt to boost their congregations.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainmen ... 545443.stm

Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:33 pm
by Rebel
Loomis wrote:As for the film in question...

It has taken over 250 million dollarsproving that we either have a lot of people feeling guilty out there, or that all it take to sell people christ is to talk about how a film is ant-semetic or bloody constantly on the news. Or it could have something to do with the fact that people are giving them away! :D
Why do you continue to make statements about the quality of a movie that you have not seen? The success of this movie has nothing to do with people feeling guilty. All of the false accusations of anti-semetism may have provided a lot of free publicity in the beginning, but that is not what has made it the overwhelmingly number one movie for 3 weeks in a row. The hype about it being too violent and bloody is keeping people away from the movie; very few, if any, people are going just because they want to see the blood and violence. The free tickets account for so much less than 1% of the box office that it makes absolutely no difference to the overall ranking.

The movie is successful because it is a very well made movie.

Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:37 pm
by Loomis
Rebel wrote: The movie is successful because it is a very well made movie.
I wasn't making a comment on the quality of the film, because as you say I have not seen it, and I doubt I will for a while.

Yes, but you have to admit - a lot of hype surrounded the release of the film because of these false accusations/focus on violence. I don't think this would have done the box office any harm!

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:06 am
by MickeyMouseboy
poco wrote:MMB wrote:
Also to Ms Poco Dearest here's 2 scriptures I want you to examen

1 Timothy 2: 10-12 - "But in the way that befits women professing to reverence God, namely , through good works. Let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence."

1 Cor 14:34 - "Let the Women keep silent in the congregations, for it is not permited for them to speak, but let them be in subjection, even as the Law says."

Like Paul said in 1 Cor 13:5a - "Keep testing whether you are in the faith ........" Ms Poco Dearest This scriptures are not to put any christian women down since their are precious jewels to the congregation. Back in the day devoted christian woman would spread the word of God's kingdom to many non-believers. Paul in many chances praised this brave and godly fearing women! This scriptures show the order in which God wants this TRUE religion, congregation, or church ran.

MMB, I am quite tired of you consistenly taking scripture out of context.

Maybe you should spend some more time with the Bible and some commentaries.

Oh and last time I checked it was Paul, not God who wrote those quotes, and it was also Paul who stated that there is neither greek nor jew, male nor [/b]female.

I will not dignify your bashing of women with another response, because that is exactly what you are doing.

Rev. Poco

So you are saying what paul said in those two scriptures are not true? Them tell me what do this scriptures mean?........... since, i'm taking it out of context. It clearly says "I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence." Yes it was Paul who wrote it, but like every book in the bible God used his holy spirit to inspired its writtings also if God didnt share in Paul's comment or idea in both scriptures he would have had it removed even worst he would have repremanded Paul in some way. Since neither happened them God must share the same feelings about a woman taking the lead in a congregation.

About Gal 3:28 talking about taking scriptures out of context.

Here's a little commentary about this subject:
Equal but Different

At the birth of the Christian congregation in the year 33 C.E., women along with men were recipients of holy spirit. This is exactly as the prophet Joel had foretold centuries earlier, the apostle Peter explained.-Acts 1:13-15; 2:1-4, 13-18.

Later, Peter came to full realization of another important fact: "God is not partial." (Acts 10:34) Literally, that scripture means that God is not a "taker of faces." A "taker of faces" shows recognition and preference for another person. In ancient times, many a judge would favor the wealthy over the poor. Or verdicts would be handed down based on nationality, social rank, family, or friendship rather than on the facts. But Jehovah does the opposite. He favors only those who fear him and work righteousness. When it comes to salvation, God does not esteem a man's 'face' over a woman's 'face.' Both are on an equal footing with him.-Acts 10:35.

Therefore, the Scriptures afford Christian men and women an equal measure of honor as members of the congregation. The apostle Paul writes to Christians in Galatia that "there is neither slave nor freeman, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one person in union with Christ Jesus." All have an independent spiritual standing before God; yet all are united as a body of his servants. All are alike in God's household.-Galatians 3:26-28.

Nevertheless, there are differences between men and women in the congregation. But just as natural differences between a man and a woman are no obstacle to their complementing each other, so the different privileges that men and women enjoy within the Christian congregation should not be an obstacle to the congregation's harmony. What are those differences?

Teachers-When and to Whom?

The differences center on teaching and authority. Women are barred from serving in an official teaching capacity in the congregation and from exercising spiritual authority over fellow congregation members. In his pastoral letter to Timothy, Paul plainly states: "I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence."-1 Timothy 2:12.

Paul next points to the basis for not allowing women to be teachers-a divinely appointed relationship between man and woman. "For Adam was formed first, then Eve," he writes. (1 Timothy 2:13) God could have created Adam and Eve at the same moment, but he did not. Adam existed for some time before Eve. Does this not reveal God's purpose for Adam to direct, to be the head, rather than Eve? (1 Corinthians 11:3) And to teach is, in effect, to act as a master, or head, over those taught. Those taught listen and quietly learn. Thus, in the congregation only men are to be teachers and overseers.

Need the fact that women do not teach in the congregation cause frustration and resentment? No. Women are free to teach Christian doctrine and are invited to do so. In what context and under what circumstances? Older women can be "teachers of what is good" to the younger women. And just as Eunice and her mother Lois instructed Timothy, so Christian women still follow their example in training children in "The Way" of the truth.-Titus 2:3-5; Acts 9:2; 2 Timothy 1:5.

Today, Christian women also follow the examples of Euodia and Syntyche by preaching the good news publicly. (Philippians 4:2, 3) They can be teachers by conducting Bible studies with interested people. (Matthew 28:20) Hundreds of thousands of women find spiritual fulfillment in this urgent work of preaching and teaching. They point others to the establishment of a world of righteousness and peace under the reign of Jesus Christ-a hope they share equally with their Christian brothers.-Psalm 37:10, 11; 68:11.
About the commentaries you urge to get, that's what I read with my bible cause I alone cannot understand it, God has provided this tools to better understand his holy book. I own quite a few and I never quote a scripture without checking this first for the full context and historical backgrounds and circumtances this scriptures were written in.

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:16 am
by MickeyMouseboy
To Loomis:
A disease designated in the Bible by the Hebrew term tsa·ra''ath and the Greek word le'pra. A person afflicted with it is called a leper.

In the Scriptures "leprosy" is not restricted to the disease known by that name today, for it could affect not only humans but also clothing and houses. The leprosy of today is otherwise called Hansen's disease, so named because Dr. Gerhard A. Hansen discovered the germ that is generally thought to cause this malady. However, though tsa·ra''ath applies to more than the leprosy of today, there is no doubt that human leprosy now called Hansen's disease was in evidence in the Middle East in Biblical times.

Varieties, With Their Effects. Today leprosy, or Hansen's disease, which is only slightly communicable, manifests itself in three basic varieties. One, the nodular type, results in a thickening of one's skin and the forming of lumps, first in the skin on the face and then on other parts of the body. It also produces degenerative effects in mucous membranes of the victim's nose and throat. This is known as black leprosy. Another type is anesthetic leprosy, sometimes called white leprosy. It is not as severe as black leprosy and basically affects the peripheral nerves. It may manifest itself in skin that is painful to the touch, though it can also result in numbness. The third type of leprosy, a mixed kind, combines the symptoms of both forms just described.

As leprosy progresses toward its advanced stage, the swellings that initially develop discharge pus, the hair may fall from one's head and eyebrows, nails may loosen, decay, and fall off. Then the victim's fingers, limbs, nose, or eyes may be slowly eaten away. Finally, in the most serious cases, death ensues. That Biblical "leprosy" certainly included such a serious disease is apparent from Aaron's reference to it as a malady wherein the flesh is "half eaten off."-Nu 12:12.

This description helps one better to appreciate Biblical references to this dread malady and the dire consequences of Uzziah's presumptuous act in improperly endeavoring to offer incense in Jehovah's temple.-2Ki 15:5; 2Ch 26:16-23.
I hope this is what you are/were expecting...... :)

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:48 am
by MickeyMouseboy
awallaceunc wrote:
MickeyMouseboy wrote: ok maybe im stupid but im not getting what you're saying..... :lol: what do you mean something has to happen to all those bodies? yes I do christians and non-christians will die in the tribulation. but what you haven't given me is scriptural proof to all this you're saying.
lol, it's ok. You said that the ressurrection of the dead contradicts what I wrote, so I was arguing that it doesn't. Yeah, the dead are ressurrected at the Rapture, but more people still die after the Rapture. Obviously, those people are ressurrected as well at the second coming. You ask for scripture, and I've given some, but I can't simply extract a verse here and verse there and lay out a case. The end times are very complicated and Revelation lays out an intricate timeline, and you have to read it in its entirety (nearly) and study and cross-reference to get the whole picture in order to view it in proper context.

-Aaron
Ok I see :D I've read revelation with study book and references and I've never read about a rapture neither in the bible nor the references. Here's what I've read: God declares war on babylon the great (false Religion), babylon gets desolated and burnt, then the leader of the world declare war on the Lamb (Jesus), God declares armageddon and destroys this system of things, while this is happening faithful christians that are in their flesh get excorted out of this battle and keeped safe somewhere of God's chosing till this God/satan war ends, "faithful christians on earth come back out of where God is keeping them safe, they start cleaning the earth from all of this desolation" (while the stuff " " is not in revelation other scriptures point to this idea) earth is made a paradise, dead are resurrected, millenium reign begins with 144,000 and jesus reigning over the "great crowd", satan and demons are locked in a dark pit for later judgement, great crowd teaches ressurected ones the truth about God (two type of people will be resurrected 1) faithful christians that died of disease, accident, natural causes, etc... that didnt have the calling to be rulers with Jesus in heaven (144,000) 2) people that never had the priviledge of knowing the truth about God by his teaching will be resurrected (people that lived before the end of times started will fall under this class) everyone else that rejected God or sinned against the spirit at anytime will remain dead like they were cut of existence, after millenium reign is over satan is let loose to do as he pleases only for a short period of time, faithful ones that fall under his cunning ways will be destroyed along with him and be cut of existance, remaining ones will live under God's kingdom forever as perfect humans, Jesus and 144,000 hand over the kingdom to God. God reigns for eternity.

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:07 pm
by AwallaceUNC
Oh, ok. I didn't realize you didn't believe in the Rapture, that does change the discussion drastically... I'm not sure we're ever going to see eye to eye on that b/c we're viewing things on two very different timelines. No, the Rapture is never mentioned by name in the Bible, that's a term people applied to it later... but the event itself is described in the Gospels and in Revelation. After years of in-depth reasearch, I wrote a 21 page paper last year that analyzes the end-time texts to present the case for a Rapture as well as it's timing. It took 21 pages... so obviously, it's not something that is going to be easily mapped out on a forum here :wink:. I feel obligated to warn you about your study book, though. Some are good, but some are very, very misguided and written by a secular source. And if you want to have some fun in studying all this, read the Left Behind series! Great books, regardless of the subject matter they cover. :) You're obviously interested in the end-times.. you might disagree with a technical point here and there in the books, but I think you'd like them.

-Aaron

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:58 pm
by MickeyMouseboy
To aaron:

The study books I use are not written by secular sources. the one I use are meticulously researched with other scriptures in the bible the might shed light on other scriptures. Also, historical references, hebrew and greek language examinations and other helpful research to help better explain the bible. Would you care if I asked you for the scriptures where this rapture is mentioned? :)

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:36 pm
by AwallaceUNC
I'm at a bit of a disadvantage, as I'm wrapping up the year at college and have taken all of my books, notebooks, papers, etc. home. Until I get back home and (a) have my notes to refer to and (b) have more time to really get back into all this... I can just give you a couple that I remember off the top of my head, that really make the case in and of themselves, though a great deal more exists:

Matthew 24: 36-44
1 Thessalonians 5:1-3

-Aaron

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:25 am
by MickeyMouseboy
awallaceunc wrote: Matthew 24: 36-44
1 Thessalonians 5:1-3

Cool! Thanks Aaron. I read both scriptures and did some research and this is what I came up with:

1 The 5:1-3 doesn't really speak of a rapture but more on God's day. It says it will come like Thief in the night, you don't know when or how. When men are screaming peace and security! and thinking that they (peace & Security) are really here to stay, suddenly destruction will come upon them and they will not escape this judgement!

now on Matthew 24:36-44:

Here Jesus is making a comparison to the days of Noah. They didn't know the day or hour of God's flood was going to come so they went about their lifes. Eating, drinking, men and woman marrying, and most likely doing the bad things they were accustomed to doing so till the day Noah entered into the Ark. They didnt take note of their wrong doings until the Flood came and swept them away and that's how the presence of the Son of man (Jesus) will be. then it goes to say out of two men in a field one will be taken and another abandon. out of two women in a mill one will be taken and the other will be abandones meaning one will be saved and one will be destroyed. like the days of Noah, God didn't rapture Noah or his family to keep them save from destruction. same with the faithful Christians and Jews how paid attention to Jesus's warning about Jerusalem's destruction, they were keeped safe in the mountains, or the Jews the escaped in Egypt again God keeped them safe from Pharaoh's harm another example is Lot and his family God keeped them safe on their way out of Sodom. The same will be this time around God is all powerful and he can keep his subjects safe from any man made weapon right here on earth. the last part of the scripture tells us to stay on guard or keep watch, because we don't know on what day our Lord is coming!
The word used here in the Greek for the expression "taken along" is also used when Joseph isis said to have taken his wife home. It is also as when Jesus is said to have taken Peter, James and John along with him into the mount of transfiguration. Jesus used the word when he said: "I am coming again and will receive you home to myself, that where I am you also may be." (John 14:3; Matt. 1:20, 24; 17:1, NW) Thus, those "taken along" receive a favorable standing with the Lord and are brought into a way of salvation. This corresponds to Noah's being taken into the ark the day of the flood and to Lot's being taken by the hand and led out of the city and therefore precedes the execution of judgment.
Checking my Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures book the word used in this scripture is "par-al-am-ban'-o" Definition: an associate, a companion. Which literally translated means "is being taken along"

Here's an article you might find interesting as well as I did :) I will be waiting for a copy of your paper once you get back home :) tell me what you think of this article.
***'Caught Away to Meet the Lord'-How?***

The word "rapture" does not appear in the Bible. But those who believe in it cite the apostle Paul's words at 1 Thessalonians 4:17 as the basis for their belief. Let us examine this scripture in its context. Paul wrote

"Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant concerning those who are sleeping in death; that you may not sorrow just as the rest also do who have no hope. For if our faith is that Jesus died and rose again, so, too, those who have fallen asleep in death through Jesus God will bring with him. For this is what we tell you by Jehovah's word, that we the living who survive to the presence of the Lord shall in no way precede those who have fallen asleep in death; because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice and with God's trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. Afterward we the living who are surviving will, together with them, be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we shall always be with the Lord. Consequently keep comforting one another with these words."-1 Thessalonians 4:13-18.

The congregation in Thessalonica was relatively new when Paul addressed his first letter to Christians there in about 50 C.E. Members of the congregation were distressed that some of their number were "sleeping in death." However, what Paul wrote comforted the Thessalonians with the resurrection hope.

Christ's "Presence"

While confirming that faithful Christians then dead would be resurrected, Paul also said: "The living who survive to the presence of the Lord shall in no way precede those who have fallen asleep in death." (Verse 15) Noteworthy, indeed, is the apostle's reference to the Lord's "presence." Here the original-language text uses the Greek word pa·rou·si'an, which literally means "being alongside."

So by saying that certain Christians living during the Lord's presence would be "caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air," Paul meant that those survivors would be meeting Christ, not in earth's atmosphere, but in the invisible heavenly realm where Jesus sits at God's right hand. (Hebrews 1:1-3) But who are they?

"The Israel of God"

The Scriptures say much about fleshly Israelites and also speak of the spiritual "Israel of God." Jewish and Gentile believers were to make up the full number of this group anointed by God's holy spirit, or active force. (Galatians 6:16; Romans 11:25, 26; 1 John 2:20, 27) The book of Revelation shows that the total number of spiritual Israel is 144,000, all of whom are depicted with the Lamb, Jesus Christ, on heavenly Mount Zion. Along with Christ, they would be kings and priests in heaven. (Revelation 7:1-8; 14:1-4; 20:6) Included among them would be individuals who had been associated with the congregations in Thessalonica and elsewhere, whatever their racial or national background.-Acts 10:34, 35.

Before any faithful members of spiritual Israel could receive a heavenly reward, they would have to share a certain experience. Just as Jesus' death on the torture stake preceded his resurrection to life in the heavens, so Christians with the heavenly hope must die before receiving their reward. (1 Corinthians 15:35, 36) That would be true of members of spiritual Israel living in the first century C.E. and of such individuals alive today.

After mentioning "the presence of the Lord," Paul pointed to the time when faithful spiritual Israelites who had died would receive their heavenly reward. He wrote: "The Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice and with God's trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first." (Verse 16) Therefore, once Jesus' presence as King began, we would expect the heavenly resurrection to start, commencing with those of spiritual Israel who had already died as integrity keepers. (1 Corinthians 15:23) They now serve alongside Jesus in heaven. But what of the comparatively few anointed Christians still living on the earth? Do they await the rapture?

"Caught Away"-How?

After referring to anointed Christians who had died, Paul added: "Afterward we the living who are surviving will, together with them, be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we shall always be with the Lord." (Verse 17) "The living" would be those alive during Christ's presence. They would be "caught away" to meet the Lord Jesus. As in the case of faithful early Christians, death as a human is necessary for them to be united with Christ in heaven.-Romans 8:17, 35-39.

In writing to Christians in Corinth, Paul stated: "This I say, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit God's kingdom, neither does corruption inherit incorruption. Look! I tell you a sacred secret: We shall not all fall asleep in death, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, during the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised up incorruptible, and we shall be changed." (1 Corinthians 15:50-52) Upon dying in faithfulness during Christ's presence, each one of the remnant of spiritual Israel instantaneously receives his heavenly reward. "In the twinkling of an eye," he is resurrected as a spirit creature and "caught away" to meet Jesus and to serve as a coruler in the Kingdom of the heavens. But what about all others worshiping Jehovah? As the end of this wicked system approaches, will they also be caught away to heaven?

Survival-But Not by Rapture

Inasmuch as Jesus' royal presence has begun, we are now deep into this world's "time of the end." (Daniel 12:4) Paul warned: "As for the times and the seasons, brothers, you need nothing to be written to you. For you yourselves know quite well that Jehovah's day is coming exactly as a thief in the night. Whenever it is that they are saying: 'Peace and security!' then sudden destruction is to be instantly upon them just as the pang of distress upon a pregnant woman; and they will by no means escape." (1 Thessalonians 5:1-3) But alert Christians will escape. How?

The cry "Peace and security!" is a precursor of the period Jesus called the "great tribulation." Describing "a great crowd" of faithful ones who have the hope of living eternally in an earthly paradise, the book of Revelation says: "These are the ones that come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." (Revelation 7:9, 14; Luke 23:43) No, theirs is not the prospect of a rapture. Rather, they have the hope of survival right here on the earth. To prepare for it, they must remain spiritually awake. How can you do this and survive the end of this system?

You need to 'keep your senses and have on the breastplate of faith and love and as a helmet the hope of salvation.' (1 Thessalonians 5:6-8 ) Now is the time to pay attention to God's prophetic Word, the Bible. As the seconds tick away until the end of this system, heed Paul's counsel: "Do not treat prophesyings with contempt. Make sure of all things; hold fast to what is fine." (1 Thessalonians 5:20, 21)

As you grow in accurate knowledge and faith, you will discern the outworking of Jehovah God's purpose to rid the universe of his foes and restore the earth to a paradise. By exercising faith, you may also be among the survivors of the great tribulation, privileged to welcome back the millions who will be resurrected to life on earth. And what a joy it will be to live under God's Kingdom in the hands of Jesus Christ and his corulers, who will have been 'caught away to meet the Lord' by being resurrected to life in the heavenly realm!

For obedient mankind in general, then, what is the true Scriptural hope? It is not a rapture. Instead, it is eternal life on earth under the rule of God's Kingdom.

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:16 am
by Loomis
I was under the impression that The Rapture were a critically hyped band from New York who had a newish album called Echoes.

Hmm...you learn something new every day...

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:04 am
by MickeyMouseboy
Loomis wrote:I was under the impression that The Rapture were a critically hyped band from New York who had a newish album called Echoes.

Hmm...you learn something new every day...

:lol: :lol: Silly Loomis

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:54 am
by Loomis
Net Round-Up: The Passion of the Christ Articles Found at Various Places on the Internet

Item #1

Zombie film 'will beat Passion'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainmen ... 549289.stm

Makes sense. The passion was about the crucifixion, zombies are all about resurrection.

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:56 pm
by AwallaceUNC
MMB- We know the Tribulation lasts 7 years, and Revelation offers a very graphic and orderly description of it. Therefore, once it starts... people are going to be able to count down 7 years and know when Jesus is coming back. Not very stealthy... nor is it "like a thief in the night." I think it's obvious that this doesn't refer to His second coming at the end of the Tribulation.

-Aaron

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:28 am
by MickeyMouseboy
Hi Aaron:

Yes! Paul talked about the coming of Christ. He wrote this after Jesus's death so I don't know about another coming of christ before the one were are in....... on Matthew 24 The apostle were asking Jesus about the End of the system of things as a general (not the jewish one) and the coming of God's Kingdom. So both scriptures speak of a future coming which is the one that we're waiting for. About the 7 years I don't know where you get that....If you're talking about the 7 bowls of anger or the 7 plagues I don't know where you're getting this from, please explain. :D

MMBoy

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 6:33 am
by Rebel
Loomis wrote:
Rebel wrote: The movie is successful because it is a very well made movie.
I wasn't making a comment on the quality of the film, because as you say I have not seen it, and I doubt I will for a while.

Yes, but you have to admit - a lot of hype surrounded the release of the film because of these false accusations/focus on violence. I don't think this would have done the box office any harm!
Your posts implied that the success of the movie was because of the negative hype. Although these accusations of "too much violence" and "anti-semetism" have motivated the media to give the movie more attention, those accusations do not encourage many people to go see the movie. Movie critics are not recommending the movie because of the negative media hype. Individuals and churches are not encouraging people to go see the movie because of the negative media hype. People are not going to see the movie multiple times because of the negative media hype. I do not know of a single person who has gone to see this movie just because of the negative hype, but I do know of several people who have decided not to go see it because of the negative hype. As far as I can tell, the accusations of "too much violence" and "anti-semetism" have done more harm to the movie's box office returns than it has done to help.

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:11 pm
by Maerj
I went to see it because first of all Mel makes some great movies and it looked like this was going to be one of them. (It was!) But, I was curious to see if it was truly anti-semetic. (And it wasn't!)

This weekend I saw Dawn of the Dead, which was another great film! A lot of fun, I highly recomend it. I think there were some scenes cut out of it either for time or gore, but I hope they do a director cut DVD with more of the good stuff. Ahhh... good stuff...

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 4:06 pm
by Loomis
Rebel wrote:Your posts implied that the success of the movie was because of the negative hype. Although these accusations of "too much violence" and "anti-semetism" have motivated the media to give the movie more attention, those accusations do not encourage many people to go see the movie.
My posts were not just implying it. I was flat out saying that. Yes, but as you said the negative hype has encouraged media attention, which is free publicity - and there is no such thing as bad publicity, especially when it is free. The people who may not have even given the film a second thought are now curious because of all the attention.
As far as I can tell, the accusations of "too much violence" and "anti-semetism" have done more harm to the movie's box office returns than it has done to help.
Oh, come on.
As I said, there is NO such thing as bad publicity, especially in Hollywood. Do you think that many people would have seen the film in the FIRST PLACE had all the hype not surrounded it?

I can't see ANY harm done, given that the film now is several weeks into it's Top 5 run, after finally being knocked off by another remake - Dawn of the Dead. That is another film that is violent, and people KNOW that is going to violent, so one can't use the "violence turns people off" excuse there. Do you think two back-to-back violent films as the #1 in the US really indicates that the majority of Americans are turned off by violence? Or is it just coincidence that the top three films in the US this weekend were about zombies, a crucifixion and a serial killer (Taking Lives) repsectively?

Yup, that sounds like a group of people who might turn away from a movie based on violent hype.

Further, the various churches have started to justify the violence in The Passion simply because it is about Jesus.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/ ... 219-1.html

Jerry Johnston, a pastor of the First Family Church: "The violence is set in a very specific context," Johnston said. "It is the last hours of Jesus".

So in the end, it doesn't matter that it is a violent film, because it is about Jesus and that is OK.

People who are Christians and read the bible - and judging from this thread, the majority of people who have seen the movie fit that description - will know that the bible is one of the most violent things ever written, so the violence should come as no surprise to them anyway. What else would one expect from a movie about the violent death of someone. People go to the movie EXPECTING the violence.

So, no - I don't think the negative publicity has hurt this film at all. In fact, I believe the combination of that and the churches encourging - and even buying tickets (see above link and links in my other posts) is the reason the film has done well.

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2004 10:52 am
by MickeyMousePal
From [url]http://www.comingsoon.%20net[/url]

"Three-week champ The Passion of The Christ dropped a spot to second but still added another $19.2 million in its fourth weekend to bring its massive total to $295.3 million. Mel Gibson's $30 million film will surpass the $300 million mark this week. "The Passion" is now the biggest R-rated film in the history of box office, taking over the mark from The Matrix Reloaded which earned $281.6 million last year. The film has also climbed to the 18th spot on the all-time domestic blockbuster list and has its eye of "Pirates of the Caribbean" at #17 with $305.4 million."

Passion will be passing the $300 million mark by next week. Coming movies that will make lots of profit also will include Hellboy, Spider-Man 2, The Punisher, Scooby-Doo 2..etc. But the money making movies will be comic book turn to movies or sequels. But The Passion of The Chirst may still be the champ of 2004.