DVDizzy Forum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT-vPExnp7o

CHUCK and Tangled promo

DancingCrab wrote:question for phan...

In the novel Rapunzel tells Flynn her hair glows whenever she sings....so does her hair start glowing at all during "When Will My Life Begin?" and/or "I See The Light" or does it have to be the incantation song that lights her up?

I know chunks of those solos are sung in voice-over but I've heard parts are sung in real time so I was just wondering if it's something we are suppose to not notice or if they explain it has to be the Healing Incantation.

Thanks

Hi! It's the Incantation that makes the magic work. It'd be pretty interesting if it was lighting up every time, haha! It's not stated outright, but it's pretty obvious from the way Gothel uses those specific words to use the flower, then later discover baby Rapunzel's hair has absorbed the magic.

Spoiler-related questions: I'm noting these for my spoiler-writeup!

Movie Surfers talk with Mandy Moore and Zachary Levi!

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3tyCr38MzO0?fs ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3tyCr38MzO0?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Why???? WHY???!!!!! Why does she have to be so beautiful?? She's going to mess up my Disney Princess ranking, untouched from many years ago!!! xD

Great video, by the way =)
The Movie surfers always show new images on each video =)

Tangled Wrap Party:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hHIIwnYCVh4?fs ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hHIIwnYCVh4?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

Link is to a blogspot I created to post what I have so far of the SPOILER summary! Follow if you want to be spoiled, DO NOT READ if you do not want SPOILERS!! You've been warned!


http://phan258.blogspot.com/2010/10/tan ... art-1.html

Sorry it's rather rough, but things are a bit crazy for me right now. I'll continue this as soon as I can!

yukitora wrote:Thankyou so much Phan! Do you think Disney has a hit on their hands?

I am rather quickly starting to feel Tangled is indeed a better title than Rapunzel after all, for the reasons cited by the directors. It seems like a whole heap of characters getting Tangled up in the story that is Rapunzel (whereas in the original fairytale, it was just a prince, rapunzel and the mother). It's like how Aurora is almost a background prop character* in Sleeping Beauty, and how it focus more on the fairies and prince philip.

*nevertheless Aurora is still my favourite disney character!

Why is Aurora that? And it was still called Sleeping Beauty! So this should still be called Rapunzel!

Disney Duster wrote:

yukitora wrote:Thankyou so much Phan! Do you think Disney has a hit on their hands?

I am rather quickly starting to feel Tangled is indeed a better title than Rapunzel after all, for the reasons cited by the directors. It seems like a whole heap of characters getting Tangled up in the story that is Rapunzel (whereas in the original fairytale, it was just a prince, rapunzel and the mother). It's like how Aurora is almost a background prop character* in Sleeping Beauty, and how it focus more on the fairies and prince philip.

*nevertheless Aurora is still my favourite disney character!

Why is Aurora that? And it was still called Sleeping Beauty! So this should still be called Rapunzel!

Well, you'll notice it's not called 'Aurora'....

phan258 wrote:

Disney Duster wrote: Why is Aurora that? And it was still called Sleeping Beauty! So this should still be called Rapunzel!

Well, you'll notice it's not called 'Aurora'....

phan I love your review the story sounds amazing so far ... when will you be writing part 2 ?
thanks again x

DisneyDude2010 wrote:

phan258 wrote:

Well, you'll notice it's not called 'Aurora'....

phan I love your review the story sounds amazing so far ... when will you be writing part 2 ?
thanks again x

Maximus has been added to Tangled.com

phan258 wrote:

Disney Duster wrote:Why is Aurora that? And it was still called Sleeping Beauty! So this should still be called Rapunzel!

Well, you'll notice it's not called 'Aurora'....

That's because the film is based on a much earlier story called Sleeping Beauty. And Aurora is the title character of said film. She is the beautiful sleeper of the title, just like how Ariel is the Little Mermaid, or Simba is the Lion King, or Quasimodo is the Hunchback of Notre Dame.

Wonderlicious wrote:

phan258 wrote:Well, you'll notice it's not called 'Aurora'....

That's because the film is based on a much earlier story called Sleeping Beauty. And Aurora is the title character of said film. She is the beautiful sleeper of the title, just like how Ariel is the Little Mermaid, or Simba is the Lion King, or Quasimodo is the Hunchback of Notre Dame.

Instead of Tangled, Disney should have, if they were following in this tradition called the film The Maiden Who Who High (In a Tower)... it would have fit perfectly with the other one character titles and sounds much more classic than boring old Rapunzel. Who wants a story that keeps it's original name? Pfsh.

Instead of Tangled, Disney should have, if they were following in this tradition called the film The Maiden Who Who High (In a Tower)... it would have fit perfectly with the other one character titles and sounds much more classic than boring old Rapunzel. Who wants a story that keeps it's original name? Pfsh.

well actually the originall titles of sleeping beauty(grimm), Hunchback and little mermaid(Andersen) were all the same, so disney used original titles...
but i can understand disney's marketing completely, i mean come on guys , they have to survive between these movies like chipmunks and shrek-like animations,. ..children these days love these sort of rubbish, turn on disney-channel for example, much different than the flinstones or scooby doo i used to see.
so disney knows children are a big inkom for their movies and they have to reach these modern children with slap stick/fart jokes(and they trick them, because rapunzel appears to be none)

nomad2010 wrote:it would have fit perfectly with the other one character titles and sounds much more classic than boring old Rapunzel. Who wants a story that keeps it's original name? Pfsh.

Uh oh! The Disney fundamentalists are not gonna like this part!

In all fairness, I still have to side with the people moaning about the particular title we ended up getting. Part of my personal anger over the title change was simply that they chose something as goofy as Tangled. They had thought of other titles (as evidenced in a Jim Hill column), some of which easily sounded more pleasing than something that sounds like a generic romantic comedy.

Anyway, I'm sorry to bring up that topic. Toodle-oo for now.

German Voice Cast



(Broken thumbnail does work)

Mobje wrote:German Voice Cast

Cool! Moritz Bleibtreu as Flint! He's one of my favourite German actors (see "Run Lola Run").

sotiris2006 wrote:

Mobje wrote:HQ: http://www.sendspace.com/file/gzgc9z

Hey, Mobje, do you happen to have any more hi-res pic goodness that you haven't already posted in the Tangled threads?

Hi Sotiris2006, i've already posted all i have...except for these
They're new!

Will Barks wrote:

Mobje wrote:German Voice Cast

Cool! Moritz Bleibtreu as Flint! He's one of my favourite German actors (see "Run Lola Run").

I don't really know him, but i did see Lola Rennt years ago.
Same movie, right?

Wonderlicious wrote:

nomad2010 wrote:it would have fit perfectly with the other one character titles and sounds much more classic than boring old Rapunzel. Who wants a story that keeps it's original name? Pfsh.

Uh oh! The Disney fundamentalists are not gonna like this part!

In all fairness, I still have to side with the people moaning about the particular title we ended up getting. Part of my personal anger over the title change was simply that they chose something as goofy as Tangled. They had thought of other titles (as evidenced in a Jim Hill column), some of which easily sounded more pleasing than something that sounds like a generic romantic comedy.

Anyway, I'm sorry to bring up that topic. Toodle-oo for now.

Haha don't be sorry, obviously everyone's entitled to their opinions! Personally my only gripe is that the change was a pretty shameless money grab--but even then, after seeing how many boys were at the screening I attended (and not just very young boys either--7 to 13 years old!), it seems to have been a successful one. I can't fault Disney for thinking a "girly" name like Rapunzel or the Princess & the Tower or what-have-you would not attract as many boys, if that's what it takes for them to make enough money to continue producing movies like this!

Most of all, a title is just a -name-. If the movie was terrible and called 'Rapunzel,' the name would not save it from being awful, just as the name 'Tangled' does not change the fact that it's turned out so beautifully.

Wonderlicious wrote:

nomad2010 wrote:it would have fit perfectly with the other one character titles and sounds much more classic than boring old Rapunzel. Who wants a story that keeps it's original name? Pfsh.

Uh oh! The Disney fundamentalists are not gonna like this part!

In all fairness, I still have to side with the people moaning about the particular title we ended up getting. Part of my personal anger over the title change was simply that they chose something as goofy as Tangled. They had thought of other titles (as evidenced in a Jim Hill column), some of which easily sounded more pleasing than something that sounds like a generic romantic comedy.

Anyway, I'm sorry to bring up that topic. Toodle-oo for now.

Nobody seems to get the drug joke I was going for. I personally think the original title should be kept. That whole post was supposed to be taken sarcastically.