Page 6 of 20

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:17 pm
by Sotiris
The teaser trailer has been released.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:23 pm
by Mooky
Kinda cool.

Now who wants to bet they'll make this a theatrical release?

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:24 pm
by Sotiris
Mooky wrote:Now who wants to bet they'll make this a theatrical release?
I do! 'Cause they won't :P

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:38 pm
by Mooky
Killjoy :evil:.

Image

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:40 pm
by Sotiris
Mooky wrote:Killjoy :evil:.
rotfl

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:26 pm
by estefan
Was that Stephen Colbert as the voice of the yellow airplane? Kind of sounded like him to me.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:04 pm
by ajmrowland
^I think he would've mentioned it on his show at some point if he were. He's pretty egotistical and loves to promote stuff he's doing.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:07 pm
by SWillie!
I wouldn't call him egotistical. I would say more along the lines of genius.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:42 pm
by Mickeyfan1990
Here's the trailer again since the one on the previous page was taken down:

http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/disne ... ailer.html

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:31 pm
by Sotiris
Mickeyfan1990 wrote:Here's the trailer again since the one on the previous page was taken down.
You're right. That's really weird considering the video was on an official Disney YouTube account.

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:52 pm
by Kyle
They seem to remove a ton of their own videos. never made sense to me. They also like to re upload the same video shortly after, with no changes at all.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:59 am
by Sotiris
Steve Hulett wrote:At Disney Toons Studios (which now has its new parking lot completed), I'm informed the creative chief will be looking at the new installment of the Tinkerbell saga. Meantime, the second installment of the 'Planes' features has started into work.
Source: http://animationguildblog.blogspot.com/ ... ities.html

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:22 am
by Disney-Fan
I guess since Disney movies no longer seemed profitable it made sense to cut back on the sequels for those movies. Using that same logic, obviously since Pixar movies make money spinoffs and supposedly-mediocre sequels are called for. Planes makes complete sense... :roll:

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:27 am
by disneyboy20022
Sotiris wrote:
Steve Hulett wrote:At Disney Toons Studios (which now has its new parking lot completed), I'm informed the creative chief will be looking at the new installment of the Tinkerbell saga.....

Source: http://animationguildblog.blogspot.com/ ... ities.html


Sorry for going off topic....

but since when the bloody hell did Tinkerbell become a "Saga:"...I Knew Tinkerbell joining e-harmony wasn't a good idea...this picture proves it...

Image


As for Pixar's Planes, Trains, and Automobiles.....or Thomas vs Lightning Mcqueen - is Mcqueen faster than a locomotive or can Thomas be faster than Lightning? Stayed tuned...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:49 am
by Sotiris
What we joked about is actually happening.
The DisneyToon animation studio, which makes direct-to-DVD films, is at work on a "Cars" spinoff, "Planes," due for release in 2013. Mr. Lasseter, who also oversees DisneyToon, said that if "Planes" is successful, he may build additional titles around boats, trains and other vehicles. "It's a bigger idea that can be expanded," he said.
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 10278.html

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:35 am
by disneyboy20022
Sotiris wrote:What we joked about is actually happening:
The DisneyToon animation studio, which makes direct-to-DVD films, is at work on a "Cars" spinoff, "Planes," due for release in 2013.

Mr. Lasseter, who also oversees DisneyToon, said that if "Planes" is successful, he may build additional titles around boats, trains and other vehicles.

"It's a bigger idea that can be expanded," he said.

Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 10278.html

Image

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:12 pm
by toonaspie
Delicious irony at its best. Lasseter says he would put a stop to DTV sequels and then goes around everyone's backs and claims it's for building up a profitable franchise. The very thing he wanted to stop at Disney is the very thing he's doing right now...creating mediocre sequels solely for extra cash.

But I don't think we have much to worry about even if Cars 2 flops. We should thank our stars that Brave is coming out next year and should hopefully give Pixar some rebound and redemption after Cars 2 does its damage.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:18 pm
by disneyboy20022
toonaspie wrote:Delicious irony at its best. Lasseter says he would put a stop to DTV sequels and then goes around and claims it's for building up a profitable franchise. They very thing he wanted to stop at Disney is the very thing he's doing right now...creating mediocre sequels solely for extra cash.

But I don't think we should have much to worry about even if Cars 2 flops. We should thank our stars that Brave is coming out next year and should hopefully give Pixar some rebound.

Go to to the 1:14 part of this clip from the Dark Knight that I think applies to Michael Eisner and Possibly now John Lasseter in a way...also I think the hero part belongs to the late Roy E Disney...

<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UfcemNhlqyA" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:15 pm
by milojthatch
^^ I may have to agree with that one. It seems when it comes to Disney, absolute power corrupts absolutely. People should only be CEO's and other powerful corporate positions there for a small amount of time to avoid becoming evil.

toonaspie wrote:Delicious irony at its best. Lasseter says he would put a stop to DTV sequels and then goes around and claims it's for building up a profitable franchise. They very thing he wanted to stop at Disney is the very thing he's doing right now...creating mediocre sequels solely for extra cash.
John Lassiter is still a hero of mine, but his reputation in my eye has been a bit tarnished the last few years. He's becoming more of a soulless corporate type the longer he stays in his position. Maybe he should have just stayed a director?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:23 pm
by disneyboy20022
milojthatch wrote:^^ I may have to agree with that one. It seems when it comes to Disney, absolute power corrupts absolutely. People should only be CEO's and other powerful corporate positions there for a small amount of time to avoid becoming evil.
The same should be applied to politicians.. as well :P

also the statement below is off topic and random

OH AND THE REAL GOOD RAZZ IS BACK YIPEE :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :pink: :P :P :P :P :P