Since you can't read well, I've posted what I stated in a previous post. X-Men has always been a story for outcasts. I've been a fan since the 90s, so you can put that little ignorant comment of yours under that silly hat you have on in your creepy icon. Your argument is a straw man argument: you incorrectly assume that just because X-Men is a fantasy, nobody should care about writers infusing modern day terminology like "nonbinary" into it. That's just the silliest, most illogical, weakest, straw man argument I've ever read. And it's rampant on message boards and social media; you're not the only one. On the same note, the people like yourself with weak arguments are so quick to call people like me who don't agree with your warped narrative as "bigotry." If writing logically and discussing opinions on one of my favorite properties ever is being a bigot, then okay, cool insult dude. I'm alright with it. It's not anger, it's logic.
I could really care less about Morph, which you'd know if you read my previous post. I think it's clear from my replies that I'm simply responding to you in the same fashion you responded to me. Personal attacks when you know nothing of me, and I don't know you. We are judging from behind computers. Are we both being childish? Maybe. So let's keep to the established topic which was keeping in historical accuracy with the terminology of 1997. X-Men TAS is a continued chronology in an already established universe. Nobody said nonbinary people didn't exist in 1997, but they surely were not a part of the narrative in X-Men the Animated Series.
Lastly, nobody answered your "Little Mermaid" quip because that is not the same at all and you know it. That's also a straw man argument, by the way. You have no leg to stand on.
And maybe even helps kick off a Gargoyles revival too